カワムラ　ヒデマサ   KAWAMURA Hidemasa   河村　英将    所属   埼玉医科大学  医学部 総合医療センター　放射線科(画像診断・核医学科、放射線腫瘍科)    職種   教授
論文種別	学術雑誌(原著)
言語種別	英語
査読の有無	査読なし
表題	The effects of PSA kinetics on the outcome of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy.
掲載誌名	正式名：Journal of radiation research
掲載区分	国外
巻・号・頁	61(6),908-919頁
著者・共著者	Hitoshi Ishikawa,Keiko Higuchi,Takuya Kaminuma,Yutaka Takezawa,Yoshitaka Saito,Toru Etsunaga,Kazushi Maruo,Hidemasa Kawamura,Nobuteru Kubo,Takashi Nakano,Mikio Kobayashi
発行年月	2020/11/16
概要	The feasibility and efficacy of hypofractionated salvage radiotherapy (HS-RT) for prostate cancer (PC) with biochemical recurrence (BR) after prostatectomy, and the usefulness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics as a predictor of BR, were evaluated in 38 patients who received HS-RT without androgen deprivation therapy between May 2009 and January 2017. Their median age, PSA level and PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) at the start of HS-RT were 68 (53-74) years, 0.28 (0.20-0.79) ng/ml and 7.7 (2.3-38.5) months, respectively. A total dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions (three times a week) was three-dimensionally delivered to the prostate bed. After a median follow-up of 62 (30-100) months, 19 (50%) patients developed a second BR after HS-RT, but only 1 patient died before the last follow-up. The 5-year overall survival and BR-free survival rates were 97.1 and 47.4%, respectively. Late grade 2 gastrointestinal and genitourinary morbidities were observed in 0 and 5 (13%) patients, respectively. The PSA level as well as pathological T-stage and surgical margin status were regarded as significant predictive factors for a second BR by multivariate analysis. BR developed within 6 months after HS-RT in 11 (85%) of 13 patients with a PSA-DT < 10 months compared with 1 (17%) of 6 with a PSA-DT ≥ 10 months (median time to BR: 3 vs 14 months, P < 0.05). Despite the small number of patients, our HS-RT protocol seems feasible, and PSA kinetics may be useful for predicting the risk of BR and determining the appropriate follow-up schedule.
DOI	10.1093/jrr/rraa074
PMID	32888035